An Evaluation of Computer Aided Learning (BRAC-CAL) in Secondary Schools in Bangladesh.


Journal article


T. Power, Rasel Babu, Tanjeeba Chowdhury
2017

Semantic Scholar
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Power, T., Babu, R., & Chowdhury, T. (2017). An Evaluation of Computer Aided Learning (BRAC-CAL) in Secondary Schools in Bangladesh.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Power, T., Rasel Babu, and Tanjeeba Chowdhury. “An Evaluation of Computer Aided Learning (BRAC-CAL) in Secondary Schools in Bangladesh.” (2017).


MLA   Click to copy
Power, T., et al. An Evaluation of Computer Aided Learning (BRAC-CAL) in Secondary Schools in Bangladesh. 2017.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{t2017a,
  title = {An Evaluation of Computer Aided Learning (BRAC-CAL) in Secondary Schools in Bangladesh.},
  year = {2017},
  author = {Power, T. and Babu, Rasel and Chowdhury, Tanjeeba}
}

Abstract

BRAC initiated Computer Aided Learning (CAL) programme, the first ever in Bangladesh, to introduce ICT based materials in teaching-learning in 2004 Along with digital contents of Science, English and mathematics of secondary level, this programme provided basic ICT and content delivery training to the teachers of programme schools. A qualitative evaluation following the Realist Evaluation framework was designed to evaluate the programme mechanism, context and outcome. Data were collected from six secondary schools selected purposively. Findings showed that both teachers and students enjoyed the CAL materials and also believed that those materials had changed classroom scenario by improving learners’ attention and participation in classroom activities. However, significant difference was not observed between CAL and non-CAL classrooms. Teachers struggled to organise collaborative learning tasks such as group and pair works. Students also had limited participation in teaching-learning process. Irregular electricity supply sometimes hampered use of CAL materials. Furthermore, students had limited access to these materials. Bearing this context the recommendations were to focus more on teachers’ pedagogic improvement and to create more scopes for students’ self use of these materials.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in